Introduction
As artificial intelligence tools become increasingly mainstream, the priorities guiding their development are being scrutinized more than ever. Are these systems built to help users—or simply to hold their attention? This very question was raised by Kevin Systrom, the co-founder of Instagram, at this year’s StartupGrind event. His remarks shed light on a growing tension in the tech world: the balance between utility and user engagement.
Kevin Systrom’s Warning on AI Engagement Tactics
Kevin Systrom didn’t mince words when expressing concern about the current trajectory of AI development. He criticized how some AI companies are falling into a pattern familiar to social media platforms—optimizing for engagement at the expense of user value.
“Every time I ask a question, at the end it asks another little question to see if it can get yet another question out of me,” said Systrom.
This statement was aimed at AI chatbots that keep users in a loop by repeatedly asking for follow-up input, even when a clear answer could be given. Rather than striving to provide meaningful and actionable responses, these systems seem designed to inflate engagement metrics such as time spent and active user counts.
The Engagement Trap: Lessons from Social Media
Systrom’s insight is especially poignant considering his experience with Instagram—one of the platforms that defined the social media engagement model. He warned that AI companies are heading down the same rabbit hole, prioritizing dopamine-fueled interactions over substance.
This concern echoes a broader critique in the tech space: that many digital products today, from news feeds to video platforms, rely on behavioral manipulation to retain users. The worry is that AI tools could similarly fall into this trap, making them less about assistance and more about addiction.
For marketers and tech entrepreneurs, this trend presents both a cautionary tale and an opportunity. Building AI-driven solutions that offer genuine value rather than shallow engagement may very well set successful tools apart in a saturated marketplace.
The ChatGPT Criticism: Too Nice, Too Vague
ChatGPT and similar AI tools have recently been criticized for being overly polite or evasive, often failing to provide clear, direct answers. This “niceness” isn’t necessarily a bug—it’s part of an effort to maintain user trust and safety. However, Systrom argues that such behavior may reflect a larger issue: a strategic pivot toward maximizing user interaction rather than offering solutions.
OpenAI responded to the criticism by referencing its user experience guidelines. These state that the model may ask for more information when a query is vague or incomplete. While this makes sense in complex contexts, it becomes problematic when such prompts are overused.
Intentional Design or Unintended Consequence?
Systrom suggests that the over-engagement seen in AI systems isn’t an unintended consequence—it’s by design. Companies are under immense pressure to demonstrate usage metrics to investors and stakeholders, and a chatbot that keeps users chatting longer can be more appealing on paper than one that gives a quick, helpful answer and ends the conversation.
This design choice reflects a misalignment of incentives, where short-term growth is prioritized over long-term trust and value. AI tools should be judged not by how many interactions they spark, but by how effective those interactions are.
What AI Companies Should Focus On
The core message from Systrom’s talk is clear: AI companies must prioritize quality over quantity. Rather than chasing inflated engagement metrics, they should strive to deliver insights that are accurate, actionable, and efficient.
Doing so will not only build greater user trust but also differentiate AI products in an increasingly competitive market. This is where ethical design practices, transparent development processes, and user-centered metrics become essential.
For entrepreneurs and businesses looking to integrate AI into their workflows, it’s crucial to evaluate tools not just on feature lists, but on how they serve user goals.
How Trenzest Interprets This Shift in AI Behavior
At Trenzest, we take a firm stance on developing and recommending AI tools that genuinely enhance productivity, creativity, and strategic decision-making. Our mission isn’t to simply chase trends—it’s to empower small business owners, marketers, and tech leaders with automation and AI solutions that actually deliver results.
Conclusion: Balancing Utility and Engagement
Kevin Systrom’s critique serves as a timely reminder: technology should serve its users, not manipulate them. While engagement metrics are important, they should never override the primary goal of AI—to provide meaningful, high-quality assistance.
As the AI landscape evolves, entrepreneurs and tech leaders must ask themselves whether they’re building for metrics or meaning. The future belongs to platforms that earn user trust through value, not gimmicks.
To stay updated on AI tools that put users first, subscribe to the Trenzest newsletter and join a growing community of innovators and thinkers shaping the next era of intelligent, ethical technology.
